THERE IS SO MUCH GOOD FANFICTION IN THIS WORLD

SO GOD DAMN MUCH

SO MANY FICS THAT I WOULD CUT OFF MY LEFT ARM TO SEE PLAYED OUT

AND PEOPLE CHOOSE FIFTY SHADES OF GREY

(Source: felixdawkins, via suriella)

serasvictorianolifequeen:

not-burnie:

Apparently my little brother was watching porn on my older brother’s Netflix account so he wouldn’t get caught but plot twist my older brother was doing the same thing with my younger brother’s account and now they’re both grounded and I’m the only one allowed on Netflix

image

wait there’s PORN on netflix?

(Source: kaijuno, via suriella)

raspbeary:

mark ruffalo is so down to earth like i feel like he doesnt even know hes a celebrity hes just some guy and all these famous people are around him and he has no clue what is happening

(via suriella)

asbehsam:


Disney has just developed an advanced new software called ‘Rapunzel Character Copy & Pasting’, a.k.a. ‘We’re Gonna Sell A Lot of Tickets Anyway, So Fuck It’.

The new entry by Dinsey’s new software

I used to love Disney …
until they stopped actually trying to design NEW characters.
asbehsam:


Disney has just developed an advanced new software called ‘Rapunzel Character Copy & Pasting’, a.k.a. ‘We’re Gonna Sell A Lot of Tickets Anyway, So Fuck It’.

The new entry by Dinsey’s new software

I used to love Disney …
until they stopped actually trying to design NEW characters.
asbehsam:


Disney has just developed an advanced new software called ‘Rapunzel Character Copy & Pasting’, a.k.a. ‘We’re Gonna Sell A Lot of Tickets Anyway, So Fuck It’.

The new entry by Dinsey’s new software

I used to love Disney …
until they stopped actually trying to design NEW characters.
asbehsam:


Disney has just developed an advanced new software called ‘Rapunzel Character Copy & Pasting’, a.k.a. ‘We’re Gonna Sell A Lot of Tickets Anyway, So Fuck It’.

The new entry by Dinsey’s new software

I used to love Disney …
until they stopped actually trying to design NEW characters.
asbehsam:


Disney has just developed an advanced new software called ‘Rapunzel Character Copy & Pasting’, a.k.a. ‘We’re Gonna Sell A Lot of Tickets Anyway, So Fuck It’.

The new entry by Dinsey’s new software

I used to love Disney …
until they stopped actually trying to design NEW characters.
asbehsam:


Disney has just developed an advanced new software called ‘Rapunzel Character Copy & Pasting’, a.k.a. ‘We’re Gonna Sell A Lot of Tickets Anyway, So Fuck It’.

The new entry by Dinsey’s new software

I used to love Disney …
until they stopped actually trying to design NEW characters.

asbehsam:

Disney has just developed an advanced new software called ‘Rapunzel Character Copy & Pasting’, a.k.a. ‘We’re Gonna Sell A Lot of Tickets Anyway, So Fuck It’.

The new entry by Dinsey’s new software

I used to love Disney …

until they stopped actually trying to design NEW characters.

ewmartin:

crazy-jensenackles-fangirl:

so apparently people talk to their pets in baby voices, but when i see my cat i’m just like ‘hey brad’ and he’s like ‘meow’ and the conversation is over.

I don’t know why but for some reason the fact that your cat’s name is brad is hilarious to me

(via suriella)

mediapathic:

nextyearsgirl:

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:
The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.
According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.
When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.
So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

This is a theological point that doesn’t come up often enough.
mediapathic:

nextyearsgirl:

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:
The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.
According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.
When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.
So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

This is a theological point that doesn’t come up often enough.

mediapathic:

nextyearsgirl:

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

This is a theological point that doesn’t come up often enough.

(Source: drunkonstephen, via suriella)